13-64-402. Collateral source evidence.

Statute text

(1) In any action in a court or arbitration proceeding for personal injury against a health-care provider for professional negligence, the plaintiff shall, within sixty days after the commencement thereof, serve written notice thereof to the third party payer or provider of any amount paid or payable as a medical benefit pursuant to any health, sickness, or accident insurance or plan, which provides health benefits, or any contract or agreement of any group, organization, partnership, or corporation to provide, pay for, or reimburse the cost of medical, hospital, dental, or other health-care services, and shall file a copy thereof with the court or arbitrator. Such service shall be made pursuant to section 10-3-107 (1) or (1.5), C.R.S., or pursuant to the Colorado rules of civil procedure.

(2) If such third party payer or provider of such benefits has a right of subrogation for such payments, it shall file with the court or arbitrator written notice of such subrogated claim, without specifying a definite amount, within ninety days after receipt of the notice required in subsection (1) of this section, and transmit a copy thereof to the party plaintiff. Failure to file such written notice shall constitute a waiver of such right of subrogation as to such action.

(3) Before entering final judgment, the court shall determine the amount, if any, due the third party payer or provider and enter its judgment in accordance with such finding.

(4) The provisions of this section shall not apply to section 25.5-4-301, C.R.S.

History

Source: L. 88: Entire article added, p. 620, 1, effective July 1. L. 92: Entire section amended, p. 269, 1, effective April 16. L. 2006: (4) amended, p. 2001, 47, effective July 1.

Annotations

 

ANNOTATION

Annotations

Law reviews. For article, "Recovery of Medical Expenses by Insured Medical Malpractice Victims", see 33 Colo. Law. 113 (July 2004).

There is no indication that the provision in this section creating a mechanism for insurers to assert their subrogation rights for medical benefits paid to a plaintiff is meant to supplant a prevailing party's right to recover costs. Mullins v. Kessler, 83 P.3d 1203 (Colo. App. 2003).

Court construed the Health Care Availability Act in harmony with 13-16-105 and C.R.C.P. 54(d) to allow a prevailing defendant to recover costs in a medical negligence action. Mullins v. Kessler, 83 P.3d 1203 (Colo. App. 2003).